<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Object Oriented Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/</link>
	<description>All you need to know what I know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sudi</title>
		<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>sudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamasis.net/?p=249#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Obessively obese philosophy
-------start--------------------

I see some words,
which i can count

colleted heap

randomly thought 
tactfully placed
 
well hailed.

life is simpler.

--------end------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obessively obese philosophy<br />
&#8212;&#8212;-start&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>I see some words,<br />
which i can count</p>
<p>colleted heap</p>
<p>randomly thought<br />
tactfully placed</p>
<p>well hailed.</p>
<p>life is simpler.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;end&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamasis Bhattacharya</title>
		<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamasis Bhattacharya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamasis.net/?p=249#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I get your allusions!

I also feel that striving for the most relativistic state is equally impossible as attaining the absolute. Hence, line or no line, we will always be biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get your allusions!</p>
<p>I also feel that striving for the most relativistic state is equally impossible as attaining the absolute. Hence, line or no line, we will always be biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shamasis Bhattacharya</title>
		<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamasis Bhattacharya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamasis.net/?p=249#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Well... this is the &lt;strong&gt;first&lt;/strong&gt; comment in my life that is written in third person!
And, I am pretty interested in knowing the slightest of differences we have, in terms of OOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; this is the <strong>first</strong> comment in my life that is written in third person!<br />
And, I am pretty interested in knowing the slightest of differences we have, in terms of OOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhruva</title>
		<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhruva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamasis.net/?p=249#comment-49</guid>
		<description>All problems eventually boil down to a problem of granularity.
That is, the quintessential question- &lt;em&gt;Where do we draw the line? &lt;/em&gt;(Which implicitly contains a question in itself. &lt;em&gt;Can a line be drawn at all?&lt;/em&gt;)


If we extend truth to have dimensional qualities, we have some comfort and, therefore, new forms of discomfort.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All problems eventually boil down to a problem of granularity.<br />
That is, the quintessential question- <em>Where do we draw the line? </em>(Which implicitly contains a question in itself. <em>Can a line be drawn at all?</em>)</p>
<p>If we extend truth to have dimensional qualities, we have some comfort and, therefore, new forms of discomfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishin</title>
		<link>http://www.shamasis.net/2009/04/object-oriented-philosophy/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shamasis.net/?p=249#comment-48</guid>
		<description>As I was going through this blog, I realized that the concepts conveyed in it were applied to the blog itself. The concept of object oriented design was broken up into two primary skill sets using the concept of  “… formulation of harmony within chaos”. And the overall content was based upon abstraction of the already existing concrete concepts.
Personally, my OOP (P-&gt; Philosophy) is slightly different. Essentially both concepts are same, only ordered and structured differently.  However, like he quoted - “There is no single ‘correct’ model of a situation, only adequate and inadequate ones”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I was going through this blog, I realized that the concepts conveyed in it were applied to the blog itself. The concept of object oriented design was broken up into two primary skill sets using the concept of  “… formulation of harmony within chaos”. And the overall content was based upon abstraction of the already existing concrete concepts.<br />
Personally, my OOP (P-&gt; Philosophy) is slightly different. Essentially both concepts are same, only ordered and structured differently.  However, like he quoted &#8211; “There is no single ‘correct’ model of a situation, only adequate and inadequate ones”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
